Not-so-Young Offenders: Older people and the criminal justice system – Part Two: The path to prison

Posted on

Part One of this mini-series discussed the ageing of our prison population, and the implications of this over the coming years. Part Two explores the interesting, but little-discussed, recent trend of increased sentencing of older people, coupled with the reverse trend for younger age groups.

Part Two: The path to prison

The changing age profile of the criminal justice system is not only seen within the existing prison population, but also when looking at sentencing rates. It is rarely acknowledged that criminal activity can also be committed by older people; they are almost universally portrayed as ‘victims’ of crime. Whilst older people are most certainly a vulnerable group and are often the targets of crime such as fraud, it does a disservice to the whole population to fail to recognise that people might be committing crimes at increasingly old ages.

 

As shown in Figure 1, between 2000 and 2015, we see an 87% increase in immediate custodial sentenced admissions to prison (defined as a count of prisoners sentenced by a court) among those aged 50+, compared with a 34% fall for those aged 49 and younger.In other words, we are not simply talking about an ageing existing prison population, but also an increasing number of older people going through the criminal justice system and being convicted of a crime. In 2017 there were over 6,100 older people (aged 50+) admitted to prison, compared to just over 3,200 in 2000, and this needs to be recognised and acted upon.

blog 001

Given the ageing of the general population, some of this increase in sentenced admissions could be explained by broader demographic trends. However, whilst the percentage change for immediate custodial sentenced admissions increased by 87% for the 50+ age group, the English and Welsh general population only grew by 25%. Moreover, for the 15 to 49 age group, admissions have seen a -33% change, compared to a 6% increase in the overall population. Other explanations, including the recent increase in sentencing for historic sex offenses, are also important to note, though they can still only tell part of a much larger story. (Note: an FOI request has been submitted by the ILC to the Ministry of Justice to request data on first offences and the types of crime for which sentenced admissions have been made, by age group.)

 

This dynamic, however, is not reflected in crime prevention programmes. Although there is certainly an important argument to make for targeting such activity at children and young people (these programmes frequently have positive outcomes and help in crime prevention), there is a dearth of activity around preventing crime at older ages, be that for first-time offences or criminal activity by frequent offenders. Whilst the overall number of crimes committed by those aged over 50 is lower than for the rest of the population, the number is growing rapidly, not only outright but also as a proportion of overall crime.

 

Acknowledging that an increasing number of people aged 50+ are going through the courts, there are many important factors to bear in mind. Firstly, there is the potential for ageism and discrimination by the jury and/or by the judge (be that positively or negatively directed). The recent increased age limit for jurors from 70 to 75 is a valuable step in ensuring that older people maintain their right to be tried by a jury of their peers, as well as ensuring that older people can remain active participants in their community.

 

It is necessary to consider appropriate bail and remand procedures for older individuals charged with a crime, in particular bearing in mind specific health factors including mental health. Guidance would be welcomed to cater to this cohort’s requirements, whilst also balancing the complex factors enshrined in the Criminal Justice Act (2003) such as punishment, public safety, rehabilitation, reducing crime rates and reparation for victims.

 

Sentencing decisions must also demonstrate flexibility and nuance, considering the complex weighting of factors including crime severity, public safety, and also demands on the public purse, noting the considerable health and social care implications associated with imprisoning older adults.

 

Recommendations

  • The Government needs to pay greater attention to the changing demographics in sentencing
  • Crime prevention programmes should be inclusive across the life course
  • More attention should also be paid to the drivers behind criminal activity at older ages
  • Courts need to be mindful of the potential for ageism and discrimination by the judge and/or jury (be that conscious or not), and guidance would be welcomed
  • The Ministry of Justice should make data available on first offences and the types of crime being committed at older ages, to help further monitor and act upon emerging trends.

 

 

Part Three of this mini-series will look at life after prison, including rehabilitation and reoffending rates. The post will explore current trends and discuss how society can better support older offenders to reintegrate into their communities.

 

 

Sally Bowell, Research Fellow, ILC-UK

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>